December 2011 Donate Today Join Us
 
 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Volume 10, Issue 12
Newsletter Archive


In Just Times: Homeless Persons' Voting Rights Under Attack
The content in this preview is based on the last saved version of your email - any changes made to your email that have not been saved will not be shown in this preview.

In Just Times header
Keep in Touch

Visit our blog Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter

There's still time to make your tax-deductible donation in 2011.  With your support, we can change the lives of millions of homeless Americans.

DONATE NOW! 
Lawyers Working to End Homelessness
News and Commentary for
DECEMBER 2011
Silhouettes

Dear Friends:

 

A new study shows that 1.6 million children are now homeless each year in our country-an increase of 38 percent from 2007 to 2010.Maria Foscarinis

 

These numbers are shocking, but the impact on the lives of the children they represent is even more troubling. Too often, homelessness means that children lose not just their home but their schooling as well-simply because they lack a permanent address and despite the strength of federal protections.

 

At the Law Center, we know that just because a law is in place doesn't mean that rights are respected.  That's why our lawyers were in court just last week on behalf of "NJ," "AJ," two New York children wrongly denied access to school.  I'm glad to report we won, and that NJ and AJ are now back in school.  Now, while their parents search for housing, these children have the stability of school: their teachers, friends, and free school meals.  Most important of all: with an education, they'll have a chance for a better future.

 

At the Law Center, we work hard every day to make rights real.

 

We can only do this with the support of those who believe, as we do, that homelessness in America is simply unacceptable-and that we can and must end it. We can only do this with YOUR support. Every victory we win is YOUR victory too.

 

We still have much work to do. You can help by supporting our work. You can also ask your member of Congress to support HR. 32, a bill that would help homeless children and their families gain access to housing.

 

I know that together, we can end homelessness in America.

 

All best wishes for the holidays and for 2012.

- Maria

 

P.S. Please take a moment to read the special note here from Law Center friend and supporter John Grisham.  

StephanopoulosArticleLaw Center and ACLU Challenge Wisconsin's Voter ID Law in Federal Court
On Tuesday, December 13, the Law Center, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the ACLU of Wisconsin filed a federal lawsuit charging that Wisconsin's voter ID law is unconstitutional and will deprive citizens, particularly homeless and poor persons, of their basic right to vote.  The lawsuit is the only active federal challenge against a photo ID law, the most common type of legislation that is part of a nationwide attack on the right to vote.

The Wisconsin law will have a particularly severe impact on homeless voters, many of whom do not have photo ID, nor any way to obtain it.  Homeless persons living on the street are unlikely to have identity-proving documents such as a birth certificate or social security card, and getting new copies is cost-prohibitive.
 
"Protecting homeless persons' right to vote is crucial, since voting is one of the few ways that homeless individuals can impact the political process and make their voices heard," said Heather Johnson, the Law Center's civil rights attorney.  "By limiting participation to Wisconsin residents with photo identification, this law effectively silences homeless persons' voices.  With homelessness rising by 12 percent in Wisconsin since the recession began, we cannot allow the state to set this dangerous and unconscionable precedent."

While homeless persons will be one of the constituencies most affected by the law, there are also broader implications.  "This lawsuit is the opening act in what will be a long struggle to undo the damage done to the right to vote by strict photo ID laws and other voter suppression measures," said Jon Sherman, an attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project.  "Across the nation, legislators are robbing countless American citizens of their fundamental right to vote, and in the process, undermining the very legitimacy of our democracy.  We intend to redirect their attention to the Constitution."   
 
The complaint says that allowing only certain types of photo ID imposes a severe burden on the right to vote in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.  It also states that the law violates the 24th and 14th amendments because it effectively imposes an unconstitutional poll tax. The lawsuit was filed the same day that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was scheduled to speak about the importance of ensuring equal access to the ballot box.

"The state of Wisconsin has created a voter ID system that is making it very hard or impossible for residents to exercise their cherished right to vote," said Larry Dupuis, legal director of the ACLU of Wisconsin. "Countless Wisconsin residents, including veterans, minority voters and seniors who have been voting for decades, will be turned away from the polls under this law's restrictive photo ID requirements. Our lawsuit aims to block this unconstitutional law so that Wisconsin can continue its proud tradition of high participation in elections."
 
NLCHP, the ACLU, and ACLU-Wisconsin filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin on behalf of 17 eligible Wisconsin voters who may not be able to vote under the law, including Carl Ellis, 52.  Ellis is a U.S. Army veteran living in a homeless shelter in Milwaukee. His only photo ID is a veteran ID card, which is not accepted under the law.

"If I can serve my country, I should be able to vote for who runs it," Ellis said. "Veterans and others who do not have a certain type of photo ID should not be kept from voting. These laws are undemocratic and un-American."


To read the full complaint, click here.   
 
CrimReportNew HUD Budget Includes Painful Cuts 

On November 18, Congress approved the HUD budget for fiscal year 2012, which runs through the end of September, 2012.  Under the terms of the budget agreement struck this summer, it was clear going into the budget process that HUD funding would likely face a cut.  Unfortunately, the eight percent cut that Congress ultimately approved was disproportionate to those of other federal agencies.  Had the cuts been allocated more equally among agencies, HUD's cut would have been 50 percent smaller.

 

The approved budget provides nominal new funding for the Section 8 program, but that funding will only go to cover the program's new renewal expenses.  No new "regular" housing vouchers will be offered, and advocates are concerned that many Public Housing Authorities will not have enough funding to reissue all the vouchers that turn over.  However, the bill did include funding for 10,000 new HUD-VASH vouchers for homeless veterans and their families.

 

Homeless assistance programs received level funding in the bill.  While this was better than many HUD programs fared, HUD had requested significant new funding to implement important provisions of the HEARTH Act; without that money, HUD will have difficulty implementing the law.  Programs taking especially harsh cuts were the public housing operating fund (cut by 14 percent) and the HOME program (reduced by 38 percent).  While HOME is a demonstrably important program that provides gap financing for many affordable housing deals and allows communities to offer tenant-based rental assistance, the program was hurt by a series of sharply critical Washington Post stories detailing misuse of previously-granted funds by a number of local government agencies and affordable housing developers.  Unfortunately, the Post series failed to put HOME in the proper context.  By focusing on a small number of problems, the articles ignored the one million units of affordable housing that the program has produced over the past twenty years.  

 

For more information, contact Policy Director Jeremy Rosen.
ForeclosureFactSheetsNew Bill Introduced to Expand Housing Rights of Domestic Violence Survivors 

On November 17, Senator Al Franken (D-MN) introduced the Housing Rights for Victims of Domestic and Sexual Violence Act (S. 1892).  S. 1892 was also fully incorporated into a much larger bill to rewrite the law governing the full slate of VAWA programs: the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2011, introduced by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) on November 30.

 

The bill, on which Law Center staff have worked closely with Senate aides, would extend the Violence Against Women Act's housing protections - which currently only apply to public housing and Section 8 programs - to other HUD programs, including homeless assistance grants, senior housing, and housing for persons with disabilities.  Protections would also be extended to housing funded through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program and through USDA's rural housing programs.

Along with expanding the scope of VAWA's housing protections, the legislation also strengthens those protections in important ways.  Under the bill, sexual assault victims would explicitly be covered.  In addition, owners and managers of affordable housing would be required to develop emergency transfer plans - ensuring that when victims need safe housing a plan is in place to obtain it.  And finally, the bill would require that tenants in properties covered under the protections receive notices about the law when they apply for housing, to help ensure they are aware of their VAWA rights as soon as possible.

For more information, contact Policy Director Jeremy Rosen.
DCOrderLaw Center Hosts Webinar on Renters' Rights for Congressional Staff 
 

On Wednesday, December 14, the Law Center hosted a webinar for Congressional district office staff focused on the rights of renters in foreclosed properties.  Focusing on the home offices, which are often a clearinghouse for constituent questions on housing, the program attracted over 150 audience members from around the country. 

 

Until the passage of the federal Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act (PTFA) in 2009, tenants were left with few options when their landlords defaulted on their mortgages.  With the collapse of the housing market in 2008, millions of renters around the country found themselves at risk of losing their homes through no fault of their own.  PTFA guarantees renters in foreclosed properties at least 90 days' notice prior to eviction by a bank or other new owner.  Bona fide tenants with written leases have the right to remain in the property until the end of their existing lease periods, which can provide months or even years of additional stability.

 

In the last few years, state and local legislators across the country have expanded on the federal law to provide even greater protections to renters living in their jurisdictions.  The webinar focused on existing federal protections, as well as state policy trends and the recent introduction of the Permanently Protecting Tenants at Foreclosure Act of 2011.  Authored by Representatives Keith Ellison (MN-5) and Pete Stark (CA-13), this bill would make PTFA permanent and empower tenants to bring affirmative lawsuits against banks and other violators through the inclusion of a private right of action.

 

In addition to Law Center housing attorney Geraldine Doetzer, speakers on the webinar included Carrie Johnson, interim legislative director and legislative counsel for Mr. Ellison (MN-5); Rebecca Lucero, counsel in Mr. Ellison's district office; Sham Manglik, policy analyst with the National Low Income Housing Coalition; and Genevieve Gaboriault, staff attorney and housing policy advocate at the Legal Aid Society of Minneapolis.

A copy of the webinar materials is available on the NLCHP website.  For more information about the PTFA, contact Housing Attorney Geraldine Doetzer. 

HumanRightsLaw Center Files Suit Against New York Department of Education 

On Friday, December 9, 2011, in two separate cases, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued rulings ordering the re-enrollment of homeless children from two families who were wrongly removed from school.  The families were represented by the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty and a team of pro bono attorneys from DLA Piper, who successfully argued that the school was in violation of the federal McKinney-Vento Act.

 

The parents of the children, N.J. and C.H. (identified by initials only because the cases dealt with minors), lost their homes for different reasons. N.J. lost her home in the Malverne School District to fire, and has been living doubled-up with various friends, some of them outside the school district.  C.H.'s two boys were living with their mother and enrolled in the Hauppauge School District.  When she lost her housing, the children began missing school as they attempted to commute from a homeless shelter.  C.H. had lost his own housing and was living with his sister in a neighboring district, but determined it was in the children's best interest to come with him.  C.H.'s younger son is autistic, and any disruption to his schedule is extremely harmful to his educational progression.

 

The children clearly qualified for McKinney-Vento's protections, which allow homeless children, including those doubled-up due to economic hardship, to remain enrolled in the same school through the end of the school year in which they find permanent housing, even as they move throughout their time of homelessness.  But both N.J. and C.H. were told their children did not qualify and that they would be disenrolled.  McKinney-Vento requires each state to have a dispute resolution procedure and to keep the children enrolled pending a final decision.  However, as these families appealed, the State failed to grant an order staying the disenrollment and both sets of children were removed from school.  The State had been twice notified by federal Department of Education monitors that their procedure violated federal law, but refused to change it.

 

In the December 9 rulings, each judge ordered the children back into school. In one of the cases, the Court went so far as to order the school district to keep the children enrolled pending full resolution of the dispute, and noted that the State's refusal to grant the stay order violated federal law.

"These victories represent important steps forward not only for these individual children, but also for the thousands of children facing homelessness in New York State," said Eric Tars, director of human rights and children's rights programs at the Law Center. "Homeless children have a right to attend school, but often have a difficult time proving their case. The court held, as Congress intended, homeless children should be in school until their situation is fully resolved. We thank the court, and we now look to Congress to strengthen these protections so children don't have to suffer more uncertainty when they are already facing the most difficult time in their lives."

EducationBillProject LEARN Attorneys Protect Homeless Children's Rights 

Project LEARN, a collaborative pilot program with DLA Piper, is already bearing fruit for the Law Center.  Its purpose is to enlist pro bono support from volunteer lawyers to protect and enforce homeless children's rights to free public education.  Roberta Ritvo, DLA Piper's senior pro bono counsel, has worked closely with Law Center staff to marshal the necessary resources to address technical assistance requests for homeless families and develop the New York litigation referenced in the previous article.  Project LEARN now boasts a team of 50 volunteer lawyers and paralegals from 20 different DLA offices across the U.S.

 

One recipient of technical assistance through Project LEARN was hosting her niece, an unaccompanied homeless youth, in her home when the school district refused to enroll the child - keeping her out of school for over a week.  "I don't know what I would have done without you," the woman said.  "Christina [Yates of DLA Piper] kept me sane, just knowing I was right and had someone to protect my rights."  With Christina's assistance, the child was returned to school.

 

The Law Center looks forward to Project LEARN's continued growth, and wishes to express its gratitude to all of DLA Piper's volunteer lawyers and paralegals who have helped in this project and who are taking the cases forward.  We would especially like to thank Roberta Ritvo for her ongoing support and commitment to protecting children's right to education, and for calling on her colleagues to join in Project LEARN's efforts.  

 
VotingRightsAssociates Advisory Council on a Roll This Holiday Season! 

The Law Center is pleased to announce that its new pro bono initiative, the Associates' Advisory Council (AAC), has been hard at work to expand the Law Center's network of young pro bono attorneys and donors. The Council is comprised of law firm associates dedicated to preventing and ending homelessness. Since its launch in July 2011, the Council has met regularly and undertaken numerous activities in support of the Law Center.

 

During National Hunger and Homelessness Awareness Week in November, the AAC hosted a Happy Hour Fundraiser at Science Club to introduce members to their colleagues and help raise awareness about the Law Center's work. The event was a great success and the AAC successfully recruit three new associates from Covington & Burling, Jones Day, and Hogan & Lovells.  More recently, the Council launched a holiday fundraising campaign, Tech Aid for Advocates, seeking to raise funds toward the $27,000 needed to overhaul the Law Center's IT infrastructure. The Law Center is thrilled with the AAC's initiative and leadership and looks forward to the Council's continued growth and success in 2012!

 

AAC Member firms include: Alston & Bird, Covington & Burling, Dechert, DLA Piper, Fried Frank, Goodwin Procter, Hogan Lovells, Hunton & Williams, Jones Day, Mayer Brown, Nixon Peabody, Simpson Thacher Bartlett, and Winston & Strawn.
This email was sent to aberes@nlchp.org by nlchp@nlchp.org |  
NLCHP | 1411 K Street, NW, Suite 1400 | Washington | DC | 20005


Back to the top

 

Our programs: Housing | Domestic Violence | Income | Children and Youth | Human Rights | Civil Rights | Hurricane Katrina | LEAP

Home | News | About NLCHP | Press Releases | Publications | Action Alerts | Calendar of Events | Contact Us | Donate | Join Us | Wiki | Privacy Policy

Copyright © NLCHP 2010